Influencer rules have officially changed in Italy —and if you’re a brand, agency, or digital talent with serious reach, you need to pay attention to the AGCOM guidelines on the matter.
The Genius Act and MiCAR represent two radically different approaches to regulating stablecoins, with the United States betting on deregulatory expansion and the European Union doubling down on sovereignty and oversight. But is the Genius Act really that smart?
As of 27 June 2025, Italy has taken a major step in modernizing the advertising of medical devices by issuing new guidelines tailored to the realities of digital communication.
NIS 2 information sharing agreements are a central focus of Italy’s cybersecurity compliance landscape this July 2025.
The Italian Data Protection Authority's recent decision gave guidance on the true meaning of personal data anonymization and the crucial distinction between the DPO as a monitor – not an executor. In a world driven by AI and public surveillance, both concepts are more relevant than ever.
The AI Act template for training data is finally here—and it’s about to reshape how disputes between copyright holders and AI developers unfold in the EU.
As part of our Gambling Laws of the World podcast, we recorded a new episode with my DLA Piper colleagues Paula Gonzalez (Madrid) and Kaat Scheerlinck (Brussels), drilling into the most urgent developments around gambling law in Spain and Belgium.
The European Commission's GPAI guidelines under the AI Act are here—and they’re about to change how general-purpose AI models are developed, distributed, and regulated in the EU. If you work with large language models, generative AI systems, or provide AI tools to customers in the European Union, these guidelines define the rules you’ll need to follow from 2 August 2025.
On June 26, 2025, the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) published two sets of guidelines to help businesses ensure their organizational compliance with the NIS2 Directive.
The Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) has fined a company EUR 420,000 for violating privacy laws in the workplace. The decision centers on the employer’s use of content from Facebook, WhatsApp, and Messenger—shared from the employee’s personal accounts—for disciplinary purposes.